Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_10.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:15:39
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.5619 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.4642 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.8068 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.7076 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.6775 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.6450 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   5.5574 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   3.1307 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.3239 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.9222 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.7286 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.5796 minutes

ans =

    12

GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.06, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.73, deficit  2.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.71, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.13, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UGUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUCA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -7.73, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.31, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.06, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.51, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.94, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UCUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUGGU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.80, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UCAAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -5.15, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
CUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
AAACU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.06, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -2.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CGGUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.87, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GAUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56387.1,  5 NTs,                 AUUUU,score      -6.25, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55                 
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
AGCAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.91, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -7.35, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUCGC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.13, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UAGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.16, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UUGAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.89, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.72, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGCUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UUUGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -5.11, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GGGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GUGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.78, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
AUUAU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
AGAUU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.40, deficit  0.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UACAA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.10, deficit  0.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GACCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAAAG 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.62, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGCGCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.21, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GCGAUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.11, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CAAUUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_52240.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -4.51, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGCGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.62, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CUUGAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.85, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CUGCUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.72, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
CGAACG 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.02, deficit  5.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.38, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGCGCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.21, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
UUAAAA 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CGGCCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -7.63, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUUCG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.95, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGAGAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GCUUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -5.69, deficit  0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.81, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GAAGAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.72, deficit  0.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GACGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.55, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUAAUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.47, deficit  0.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GCUAUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.29, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGCUUU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -4.81, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGUAAG 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.69, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAUCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.73, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UGAGAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -7.23, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CCCUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.32, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAAUUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_52240.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -4.51, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGAGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUGGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.86, deficit  1.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GCGAUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.11, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
GUCUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.03, deficit -0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAUUAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -3.95, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.07, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
AGGCUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -6.30, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CAUUAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -4.07, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.85, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
GGGCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.69, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.44, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
GUAAUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.58, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GUGAAC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.63, deficit  6.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CACAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.46, deficit  0.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UUGAUA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_29487.1,  6 NTs,                CUGAUG,score      -2.54, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s35-s55                       
GGUCCC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -5.72, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUGCGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -4.93, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
GGCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.70, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.95, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UGGUGA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.26, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.47, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GCUUAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -7.17, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CUGGUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -3.87, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.64, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GAAGUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.09, deficit -0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UUCACG 1  Matches  5; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.37, deficit  6.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.40, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGUCCC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -5.72, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUAUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.17, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGCCUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.97, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
GGCCUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.97, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CAAUGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUGAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.73, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUGAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.56, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.11, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UUUCAGA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -7.37, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGAAUUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  0.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
UUAGUCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CUAAAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.54, deficit  1.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CGUCCAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -7.38, deficit  1.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
CGUAUCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -6.34, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUCAAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.40, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GCCUUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.07, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUCAAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.40, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UGACAAA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.33, deficit  0.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUAAGUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.16, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGAACUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.93, deficit  0.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UGUCCAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -7.44, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GUAUCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGGCUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.46, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUGAAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.17, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUAAUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -5.09, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CUCAACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -5.87, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGUGGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.11, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
GGGAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAUUGUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CGAAUUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  0.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
GAUCCAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -8.20, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
ACUCAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.28, deficit  1.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUUGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -10.69, deficit  4.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
UCAUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.27, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGUUGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.70, deficit  3.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GGAAGUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.45, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUAAGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.09, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GUCCCAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAAUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.06, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
AGUGAGU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.46, deficit  0.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GUUGUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.33, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
AGAUGGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.96, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UUCCUAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.82, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CCUCUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -5.29, deficit  0.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.77, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GUUACAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.70, deficit  1.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CAUUGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.19, deficit  1.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAUCAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.83, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGCAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.90, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUAGUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
GAUACUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.68, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GUAGCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GUGGUGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -6.82, deficit  0.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
ACGGAAUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.35, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AAGAAAAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score     -10.13, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
AAAAUCUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.94, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GACGUUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.79, deficit  1.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UGGUUCUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.04, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CAAGGUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.87, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CGUUGAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.03, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGGGUUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.54, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGUUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -9.72, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GCGACAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -7.74, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCGAGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.40, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GGGUAACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.63, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CUUUGUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.46, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
AGAAAACU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.12, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GCCGUAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -8.35, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
CGUUAGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.15, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CUUGGUGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.34, deficit  1.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAAAGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.01, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CUUCUUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -11.56, deficit  5.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
GCCAGGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score     -10.27, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CGUAAUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -6.22, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCUUCGUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.76, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGAGGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -9.92, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GUUGAUUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -5.68, deficit  1.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CCCCGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -9.43, deficit  2.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
CUUCAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -9.90, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GUAUUUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -9.80, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CGGUCCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -17.25, deficit 10.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGGGUGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -10.82, deficit  2.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UUGCUGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -15.66, deficit  8.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
UGAAGUUA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.65, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGAAAUGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.34, deficit  0.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAUAUGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.90, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GUACAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -9.97, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GAGAUAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CUCAGGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.81, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
GCACUCUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.57, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUUAAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.66, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGGAGCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.51, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGUUUCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.82, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CUAUGGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.01, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CUCGCUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.18, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GGUGUAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.24, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
GGUGUGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.10, deficit  3.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGAGUGCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score     -10.96, deficit  7.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GAUUCGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score     -10.37, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUCUGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.68, deficit  4.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCAUAAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.46, deficit  3.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CUAUGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.06, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
AUAGUCAGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -11.70, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAGAAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.08, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
UUUGUAAAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -7.68, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
CUGCGUCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score      -9.80, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGUGGCAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUCUAGACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -8.75, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CGCUUUUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score     -11.33, deficit  6.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GGUGAGUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -6.28, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUGUGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.52, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CUGAUAGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.37, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GGAUCACCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.13, deficit  7.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUCGAGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -11.74, deficit  7.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAUAAGGUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -11.01, deficit  5.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GUCAAAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.71, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
UUUUGGUGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -8.58, deficit  2.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUAAUGUAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.12, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUAAAUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -12.09, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
UUUAAACAA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.89, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUAGAGCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.76, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUCGAAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.77, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
GUACGAAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -12.29, deficit  8.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
UUAACUUUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.71, deficit  6.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUUCGACC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.43, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
CGUUUCCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -10.27, deficit  6.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
CUUCUCAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
ACUGGAUAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -8.58, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
UUUCACUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -7.08, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
CGUGUGGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.62, deficit  4.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
UAAACAUGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -10.28, deficit  4.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUUGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -8.36, deficit  1.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GGCAGUAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CGAUUCCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.53, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAAUGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.92, deficit  2.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCUGUAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -6.13, deficit  0.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GUUAGAGUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CAGCUUUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score      -8.11, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GGUGAAGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.59, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GAAAAAUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -10.18, deficit  4.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUGCCUGAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.86, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
GAUUUCUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.02, deficit  5.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
GAAAGAACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GACGUUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.94, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
AAAUUUGGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.48, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
UUGAAGAUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.17, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CAACUGUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score      -9.74, deficit  0.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CUAUGUAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -9.81, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUCACGAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.93, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCGUUUUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.28, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
CGGAAAUGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -9.39, deficit  4.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GAAACGAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUAACCUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -17.44, deficit 10.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGAGCUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -15.62, deficit  7.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
GGCCCUUAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -13.32, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
AAAGAUCCGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.79, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.64, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CCGUAAAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -8.14, deficit  1.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
UGUAAAAUAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -15.48, deficit  7.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UCUCGAAAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -13.48, deficit  7.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AGGUAAUGCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.63, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GGGUGAGCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -13.90, deficit  5.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGCAAUCUGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.33, deficit  4.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGACAAUUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.26, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGUCAUGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -11.88, deficit  6.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
UGAGGUGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -14.39, deficit  7.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AUCAUCUGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.22, deficit  6.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CGCUCUGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -13.54, deficit  7.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
GAGCAAUCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.64, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CGAAAAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.01, deficit  6.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.84, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUCGAAGUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -12.44, deficit  6.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CCGUUGACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -11.68, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.00, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CUCUGAAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -11.32, deficit  7.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
GGAGCUUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -14.23, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
AGCAAAGGUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.04, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAACAGAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.11, deficit  6.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGCAUUAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.40, deficit  7.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAAAGGAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -8.15, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUACGAACAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -11.56, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
GUUUAAAACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -8.57, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGUCAUUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -14.25, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CGAAGAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.33, deficit  7.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CACGAUAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -12.97, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CGGAAAGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -8.16, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGGACGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGAGAGCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.93, deficit  7.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GCCUACUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.74, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CAUAGCAGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -11.54, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGCGUGGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.47, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAUUAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -15.84, deficit  9.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
AUGUCUGCAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.87, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
CCGCGAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -9.22, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
GAGUGCUUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score      -9.54, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GGAAGUAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -11.56, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCUGAGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.93, deficit  6.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CUAAAACCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.16, deficit  7.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CUGUAAAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -8.64, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCUUGUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -16.08, deficit  5.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
CGGUAAAUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -8.09, deficit  0.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGCACUGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.64, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GCAUUGGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.69, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUGGCAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score      -9.58, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCGCGGAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -12.56, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.97, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
GACUGGAAGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -11.19, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GUAAACUUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -15.24, deficit  9.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CUCCAAGCGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -11.79, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
UUCUUGAAGUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -10.94, deficit  3.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
GGAAUUAGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -10.21, deficit  0.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCCGUUGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.27, deficit  5.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.72, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGACCUUGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.44, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAGUAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score      -8.97, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGACACUGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.22, deficit  7.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.34, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAUUCUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -17.26, deficit  9.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAAAACAGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.21, deficit  7.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CUUAAAGAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -12.96, deficit  7.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUUUUAAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -9.33, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CGUUUUUGUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -10.69, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
GUGAGAGAUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.19, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUCUUCAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.19, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CAGCCACAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_10751.2,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.11, deficit  6.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.32, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33                   
CGCAAUAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.35, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.40, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CUGUACAGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.99, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUUUAUCAGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.97, deficit  7.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUCAAUCAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.84, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.50, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAAAACAAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -14.08, deficit  6.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
AUGGACCAGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -13.04, deficit  5.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.51, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGAGAUACUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -10.71, deficit  3.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCCGAGUAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -15.37, deficit  6.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CGAUUUGGUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -11.78, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CAUGAUGAUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.61, deficit  6.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUACGACGCGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.06, deficit  6.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.51, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
AGUUCCCCAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.33, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUAAGGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.65, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
UAGAUAAAAGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -16.64, deficit  9.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAACAUUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GGUAUGCAGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.69, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UUAUCUCAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -10.59, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGGAGCGAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -13.21, deficit  5.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.63, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUCAAGUUGUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -13.20, deficit  7.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
AUAUCAAGUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.63, deficit  5.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAGUCUGAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -11.72, deficit  4.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.49, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GCAGCGCCAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score      -9.62, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
GGCAUUGACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -15.76, deficit  8.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAACUGCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CUCAAAAGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.10, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGAAGACUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -10.73, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GGAUUAGAGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.44, deficit  5.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.64, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CUAUCGCGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.82, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
CUCUUCGAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.66, deficit  7.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUUGUUAUAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -12.00, deficit  5.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
CGCGAUUAGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
UUUCUAAGUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -13.71, deficit  7.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GUAAAAGAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.81, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
AGAUCCGAGAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.15, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGACUUACUGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -15.14, deficit  7.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GAUUAAGCUUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -12.20, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.70, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
CCUUUUGAUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -13.34, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.72, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CCUACAGAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -15.23, deficit  8.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UGAAAUUGAAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -16.41, deficit  9.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GGUGAGACCCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -13.76, deficit  7.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CUAAUCCUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.61, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAAGACCUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.66, deficit  8.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAAUAAUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.69, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CAUCAGCGAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -12.33, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
CGUGAAAACGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -11.77, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CUGGAAUACGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -16.56, deficit  8.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAACGAUUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.68, deficit  4.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.12, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUCAGUACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.63, deficit  4.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGCAGAACAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.69, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
UAUGAAUGGGGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20714.1, 11 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -16.32, deficit  7.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.95, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUGAAAGCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.12, deficit  7.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
GGACGUCAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.10, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAAACUAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.61, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
AGAUCAGGUCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -14.71, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.51, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
CCUAGAUCGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -14.15, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CGGCCGGGGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -15.94, deficit  9.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GGAAAACCUAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.70, deficit  7.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUCGACGAUAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -20.90, deficit 10.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GGGGGUGAUGUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68863.1, 11 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -13.85, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.08, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F   
GGGGUAGAGGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.92, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGGUCGCGAAACA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -14.83, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.54, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CAAAUAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.65, deficit  6.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CUAAAAGAUUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.51, deficit  6.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAAGGGAAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -12.23, deficit  5.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGGAAGCGAAAGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -12.43, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CGGAUCAAAUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -14.92, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.80, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
GUUGAGAGCAUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -17.90, deficit  7.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
UGGCUUACAACCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -20.51, deficit  9.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAAAGAGGUUCGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -14.78, deficit  3.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.21, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
CCUUUGUAUGGUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_03603.1, 15 NTs,       AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU,score     -16.15, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.05, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGGAGGUGGAGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -13.67, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
CGUGGUAUGACGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 12 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -18.65, deficit 10.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35
CUCAAUUGGUCGAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58539.1, 15 NTs,      UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG,score     -16.22, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.09, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAAUGCAUUCUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_56677.4, 13 NTs,       CUGAACGCAUCUAAG,score     -17.38, deficit 11.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 82.4000	 69.0000	4
5	100.0000	 91.2000	 48.4000	23
6	100.0000	 87.0000	 49.2000	60
7	 99.8000	 50.4000	 15.2000	51
8	 99.0000	 28.0000	  3.6000	46
9	 99.2000	 19.2000	  1.8000	68
10	 94.6000	  9.0000	  0.4000	41
11	 85.4000	  4.0000	  0.0000	42
12	 45.0000	  0.6000	  0.0000	23
13	 16.8000	  0.2000	  0.0000	12
14	  6.6000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.6000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.4000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.2000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  41 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  90 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  91 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 224 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 227 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 230 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 231 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 234 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 239 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 260 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 270 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 283 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 294 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 300 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 306 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 307 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 307 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 309 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 316 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 319 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 322 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 332 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 343 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 353 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 363 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 372 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 373 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 383 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 426 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 432 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 443 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 465 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 476 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 521 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 522 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 536 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 548 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 569 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 578 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 609 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 625 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 627 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 699 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 747 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 813 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 950 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.4833%
Number of models giving false positives is 299 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.82
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.50
